Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Van Sycicel, Brown, Sims, Smith. 11. For reversal — None.
ARTHUR E. BERRY, GUARDIAN, &c., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ANNA M. POTTER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
57 N.J.L. 201
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.