LAW.coLAW.co

The State of Washington, on the Relation of George Bradley, Prosecuting Attorney, Respondent, v. P. E. Berry et al., Appellants

Washington Supreme Court1895-11-11No. No. 1932
13 Wash. 708

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a proceeding in quo warranto, and involves the validity of the organization and existence of the town of Water-ville, as a municipal corporation. This is the only question presented, and as it has been heretofore expressly decided by this court in Pullman v. Hungate, 8 Wash. 519 (36 Pac. 483), and-subsequently affirmed in State ex. rel. Rice, v. Centralia, 8 Wash. 659 (36 Pac. 484), and Abernethy v. Medical Lake, 9 Wash. 112 (37 Pac. 306), and as we are satisfied therewith, we decline to enter upon any further discussion of the question, and affirm the judgment rendered in the lower court .herein.