Per Curiam.
The opinion below is affirmed, for the reasons given bythe Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Lippincott, Ludlow, Mague, Van Syckel, Brown, Krueger, Smith, Talman. 10. For reversal—None.
ALLEN MAGOWAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. GEORGE H. STEVENSON ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
58 N.J.L. 408
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.