Per Curiam.
The judgment below is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
For-affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Lippincott, Ludlow, Mague, Yan Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Smith, Talman. 10. For reversal—None.
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
Per Curiam.
The judgment below is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
For-affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Lippincott, Ludlow, Mague, Yan Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Smith, Talman. 10. For reversal—None.