LAW.coLAW.co

HENRY SUTCLIFFE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. W. H. HUMPHREYS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1895-11
58 N.J.L. 409

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The opinion below is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief .Justice, Depue, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Brown, Krueger, Sims, Smith, Talman. 11. For reversal—None.