Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Gelman in the Chancery Division. Langeveld v. L. R. Z. H. Corporation, 130 N. J. Super. 486 (Ch. Div. 1974).
JOHN P. LANGEVELD, PLAINTIEF-RESPONDENT, v. L.R.Z.H. CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND JOSEPH A. HIGGINS, SR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
137 N.J. Super. 557
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.