O’HERN, Justice,
dissenting.
I would reverse the judgment of the Law Division, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Gaulkin’s concurring and dissenting opinion, reported at 254 N.J.Super. 401, 603 A.2d 954 (1992).
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
O’HERN, Justice,
dissenting.
I would reverse the judgment of the Law Division, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Gaulkin’s concurring and dissenting opinion, reported at 254 N.J.Super. 401, 603 A.2d 954 (1992).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 254 N.J.Super. 401, 603 A.2d 954 (1992).