PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Keefe’s opinion reported at 217 N.J.Super. 158 (Ch.Div.1986).
THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND ROSEANNE AMENDOLA, T/A MENLO PARK AMOCO, AMOCO OIL COMPANY & AMOCO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON AND TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
220 N.J. Super. 294
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.