Per Curiam
The judgment below is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Gummere, Eeed, Van Syckel, Brown. 5. For reversal—Dixon, Bogert,. Krueger, Sims. 4.
PETER HERTER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE GOSS & EDSALL COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
59 N.J.L. 268
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.