Pee Curiam.
It is clear that the case was one for decision by the jury. No question is raised as to the correctness of the exposition of the law by the judge in his submission of the case to that body. Let the judgment be affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Mague, Van S yokel, Bark alow, Bogert, Da yon, Hendrickson, Nixon. 11.
For reversal—None.