LAW.coLAW.co

THE KNOWLES LOOM WORKS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. J. VACHER AND R. J. HOGUET, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1896-11
59 N.J.L. 586

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed, for the reasons-given by the Supreme Court in its advisory opinion. For affirmance—Dixon, Gummere, Lippincott, Magie,. Barkalow, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon. 9. For reversal—The Chancellor. 1.