Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court. For affirmance—Depue, Gummere, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon. 8. For reversal—None.
MAHLON SPEICHER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY TELEPHONE COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
60 N.J.L. 242
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.