LAW.coLAW.co

Dana H. FRACTION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2003-06-24No. No. 03-1561
67 F. App'x 228

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dana H. Fraction appeals the district court’s order dismissing her second civil action in which she alleged wrongful termination as precluded by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fraction v. Bank of America Corp., No. CA-02-4158-MJG (D.Md. Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.