PER CURIAM.
Dominique Muhammad Salaam-X appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Salaam-X v. Pendergraph, No. CA-03-37-3-MU-02 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We deny Salaam-X’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.