LAW.coLAW.co

Isiah JAMES, Jr.; Maurice Mack, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. C. Kelly JACKSON, Solicitors Office of the Third Judicial Circuit in his collective individual and/or official capacities, Defendant-Appellee

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2003-06-24No. No. 03-6239
67 F. App'x 233

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

Isiah James and Maurice Mack appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See James v. Jackson, No. CA-01-3981-13BD (D.S.C. Jan. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.