LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felemond NAVA-BANUELOS, aka Filemon Nava-Banuelos, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2003-06-13No. No. 01-30411; D.C. No. CR-00-00262-TSZ
67 F. App'x 456

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Felemond Nava-Banuelos appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 188-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A) and 846.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Nava-Banuelos has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Nava-Banuelos has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.