PER CURIAM.
The sole question raised by the appellant in this case is whether there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s negligence to support the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff. We agree with the district court, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge McGranery denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, 82 F.Supp. 54, that the evidence was sufficient. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.