Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Barlow, reported at 82 N. J. Super. 340 (Law Div. 1964).
DANIEL B. ROSETTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, IN THE COUNTY OF MERCER, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT
96 N.J. Super. 66
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.