Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 159 N. J. Super. 44.
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 159 N. J. Super. 44.
Sullivan and Pashman, JJ.,
dissenting: We would
reverse the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Larner in the Appellate Division, reported at 159 N. J. Super. 44, 52. For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Clifford, Schreiber and Handler — 4.
For reversal — Justices Sullivan and Pashman — 2.