Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court- is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—Depue, Van Syckel, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Bogert, Nixon, - Hendrickson,. Adams, Vredenburgh. 10. ... For reversal—None.
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CHARLES HOLLE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
64 N.J.L. 363
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.