LAW.coLAW.co

Leocadia Schaad, Respondent, v. George M. Edebohls, Appellant

New York Superior Court1894
9 Misc. 708

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Freedman, J.

The complaint states but one cause of action, and it is sufficiently definite and certain. If the defendant had complained of the prolixity and redundancy of the complaint, he might have met with better success. What he really sought to obtain was the particulars of certain allegations, and his remedy for that purpose was by motion for a bill of particulars. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

McAdam, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.