Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Furman in his opinion which is reported in 121 N. J. Super. 589 (Ch. Div. 1972).
CHARLES FRANK AND WOODBRIDGE MONUMENT WORKS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND NEW JERSEY CEMETERY BOARD AND CLOVER LEAF CEMETERY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND ROCKY HILL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, A DEFENDANT JOINED BUT NEVER SERVED
126 N.J. Super. 359
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.