Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Consodine reported at 123 N. J. Super. 566 (Ch. Div. 1973).
S. C., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. A. C., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
128 N.J. Super. 198
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.