LAW.coLAW.co

William C. Glass, petitioner-respondent, v. Euphemia M. Glass, defendant-appellant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1926-05-17
99 N.J. Eq. 884

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

We have examined with care the evidence in this case, in the light of the argument of counsel, and are satisfied that the decree is fully supported by the evidence and is right. The decree will therefore be affirmed. For affirmance — Tebhci-iakd, Paekee, Kalisch, Black, Katzefbach, Campbell, White, Gaedfeb, Vaf Buskiek, MoGlekfof, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.