LAW.coLAW.co

Melvin Eugene ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dwight CRANFORD; Melissa D. Pelfrey; James G. Harris, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2003-04-24No. No. 03-6433
69 F. App'x 108

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Eugene Robinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Robinson v. Cranford, No. CA-03-145-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.