Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s denial of appellants’ motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Frances Greifenberger et al., Appellants, v. George Pav et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants
89 N.Y.2d 963
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.