On the Court’s own motion, appeals by appellants Collins and King dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motions for leave to appeal by appellants Collins and King denied.
In the Matter of Arlene M. Carella, Respondent, v. Charles E. Collins, III, et al., Appellants
89 N.Y.2d 854
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.