LAW.coLAW.co

ISAAC W. COLES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MIDLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1902-11-17
68 N.J.L. 413

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Dixon in his opinion in that court, reported as Coles v. Midland Telephone and Telegraph Co. 38 Vroom 490. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Yan Syckel, Collins, Fort, Garretson,_ Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Yredenburgh, Yoori-iees, Yroom. 12.

For reversal—None.