LAW.coLAW.co

DEN, ON THE DEMISE OF LEE, v. EVAUL

New Jersey Supreme Court1793-11
1 N.J.L. 233

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Kinsey, C. J.

It appears that on the 10th of April, 1793, before execution executed, notice was given of a defence, and the rules offered, by which means plaintiff would not have been delayed of a trial, which, by the terms offered, might have been had at the succeeding circuit as early as if the rules had- been delivered between September and November, 1792.

The practice of this court has always been, where no trial was lost, to set aside a regular judgment in all cases where there is a real defence, on payment of costs, even- in cases where defendant may be chargeable with neglect.

But omissions which arise from mistake, and where there is an appearance of a just defence, have a stronger claim to the interposition of the court.

Let judgment be set aside, on payment of costs.