PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D’Annunzio’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 613 A.2d 1167 (1991).
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D’Annunzio’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 613 A.2d 1167 (1991).
POLLOCK and GARIBALDI, JJ.,
dissenting.
We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Gruccio’s dissenting opinion, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 400, 613 A.2d 1167, 1169 (1991). For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, O’HERN and STEIN — 5.
For reversal — Justices POLLOCK and GARIBALDI — 2.