Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Parker, Scudder, Van Syokel, Brown, Cole, Paterson. 10. For reversal — None.
ENOS TOMLIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. HENRY W. SAWYER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
47 N.J.L. 173
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.