PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 267 N.J.Super. 439, 631 A.2d 1245 (1992).
MARIA RIBEIRO COSTA-HUGHES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. MULLEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
134 N.J. 187631 A.2d 1245
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
Opinion
STEIN, J.,
dissenting.
I would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brochin’s dissenting opinion, reported at 267 N.J.Super. 439, 631 A.2d 1245 (1992).