LAW.coLAW.co

THE STATE, JAMES DUFFY, PROSECUTOR, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. EUGENE BRITTON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1886-03
48 N.J.L. 371

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

The Chancellor.

The judgment of the Supreme Court in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Parker, Reed, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McG-regíor, Paterson, Whitaker. 14. For reversal—Hone.