Per Curiam.
The judgment below in this case is affirmed, for the reasons stated by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Depue, Dixon, Parker, Reed, Scudder, Van Syokel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 12. For reversal. — None.
KERAN COLGAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN PELLENS DEFENDANT IN ERROR
49 N.J.L. 694
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.