Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 10. For reversal — None.
GEORGE JACKSON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
50 N.J.L. 175
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.