THE STATE, EX REL. FRANCIS T. F. RANDOLPH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. R. FRANK WOOD, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court in its opinion. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Eeed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 10. For reversal — None.