LAW.coLAW.co

WALLINGFORD v. WOOD et al.

Oklahoma Supreme Court1914-02-28No. No. 3474
41 Okla. 572139 P. 252

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal was filed in this court January 2, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have the)- offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want, of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 136 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 135 Pac. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 137 Pac. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 836, 137 Pac. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.