LAW.coLAW.co

Catharine Bloomer, appellant v. Catharine Bloomer et al., executors, &c., respondents

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1926-10-27
100 N.J. Eq. 361

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the -reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennón, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.