Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the-reasons duly given by that court. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Van Syokel, Brown, Clement, Cole,. Smith, Whitaker. 11. For reversal—None.
LYDIA VAN SICKELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PETER J. STAATS ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
52 N.J.L. 559
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.