Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given hv that court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Depue, Garrison, Magie, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Mc-Gregor, Sm-ith, Whitaker. 11. For reversal—None.
ELIZA BESEMAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
52 N.J.L. 221
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.