LAW.coLAW.co

THE STATE, CAROLINE M. DARCY, PROSECUTRIX, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. HENRY G. DARCY ET AL., DEFENDANT IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1889-11
52 N.J.L. 222

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed,, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Knapp, Magie, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McGregor, Smith, Whitaker. 13. For reversal—None.