LAW.coLAW.co

Edward H. Wells, executor, &c., respondent, v. Kate Amelia Bennett et al., trustee, &c., appellants

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1926-10-27
100 N.J. Eq. 358

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 15. For reversal — Hone.