Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Martino, 116 N. J. Super. 106 (Law Div. 1971).
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MATTHEW J. HALE, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
120 N.J. Super. 469
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.