LAW.coLAW.co

Frederick Mead, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Co. et al., Appellants

New York Superior Court1895
12 Misc. 646

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Cu/riam.

The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below. The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.