PER CURIAM:
Sonji Prince Pabellón appeals the district court’s denial of her motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Pabellon, No. 98-CR-1169 (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.