LAW.coLAW.co

Otto Venino, Jr., appellant, v. August Naegele et al., respondents

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1926-10-27
100 N.J. Eq. 357

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Ohiee-Justice, Tbehchaed, Pae-KEE, MlHTUBH, KaLISCH, ¿LACK, KaTZEHBACH, CAMPBELL, Lloyd, White, Gabdheb, Yah Buskiek, McGlehhoh, Kays, Hetpield, JJ. 15. For reversal — -None.