Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Scudder, Van Syckel, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 8. For reversal—Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Reed. 4.
JAMES STRONG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. EDWIN A. GASKILL ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
53 N.J.L. 665
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.