Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Knapp, Scudder, Van Syckel, Clement. 7. For reversal—Dixon, Magie, Bogert, Brown, Smith. 5.,
WILLIAM C. SHAW, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE WOODBURY GLASS WORKS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
53 N.J.L. 666
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.