LAW.coLAW.co

KATHY WILNO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Supreme Court of New Jersey1982-05-13
89 N.J. 252

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Allcorn, reported at 180 N.J.Super. 146, 152 (1981).

dissent opinion

PASHMAN, HANDLER and O’HERN, JJ.,

dissenting:

We would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for. the reasons expressed in the opinion of the majority of that court, reported at 180 N.J.Super. 146 (1981). For reversal—Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and POLLOCK—4.

For affirmance—Justices PASHMAN, HANDLER and O’HERN—3.