LAW.coLAW.co

DANIEL A. KERLEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR, &C., OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1892-06
54 N.J.L. 601

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below. For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Werts, Clement. 5. For reversal — The Chancellor, Magie, Bogert, Smith, Whitaker. 5.